The Supreme Court held that capital punishment for the crime of rape is an excessive and disproportionate penalty, and therefore contrary to the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments in the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
While serving sentences for murder, rape, and other crimes, Ehrlich Anthony Coker escaped from a Georgia prison. That same evening he raped a woman in her home and then forced the woman to leave with him. When apprehended, he was tried on charges of rape, armed robbery, and kidnapping. Using procedures that had been approved by the Supreme Court in Gregg v. Georgia
By a 7-2 vote, the Court reversed the death sentence and remanded the case to the trial court for new sentencing. Writing for a plurality, Justice Byron R. White
The Coker decision suggested that the Court would probably not approve of capital punishment for any crime less than intentional murder. The majority of the justices have usually rejected the disproportionality principle in noncapital cases, as in Rummel v. Estelle
Capital punishment
Cruel and unusual punishment
Due process, substantive
Eighth Amendment
Gregg v. Georgia
Quirin, Ex parte
Rummel v. Estelle
Solem v. Helm