The Supreme Court refined the clear and present danger concept to clearly require an imminence test.
Charlotte Whitney was a member of the International Workers of the World (IWW) and briefly a member of the Communist Labor Party, which advocated the overthrow of the U.S. government. There was no indication that Whitney did more than attend meetings, but the jury convicted her on criminal syndicalism
Justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis D. Brandeis concurred, with some very significant differences from the majority. They argued that Whitney’s lawyers failed her and therefore the conviction needed to stand, but they believed her lawyers might have succeeded had they used the argument that clear and present danger needed to be imminently present for her to be convicted. The justices insisted that imminence was a crucial requirement before the government could restrain speech. Only with the concept of imminence did the clear and present danger doctrine offer much hope of protecting free speech. Eventually Whitney was overturned by the Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio
Abrams v. United States
Assembly and association, freedom of
Bad tendency test
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Clear and present danger test
Gitlow v. New York
Schenck v. United States
Speech and press, freedom of
Stromberg v. California
Whitney v. California