Jordan v. Tashiro Summary

  • Last updated on November 10, 2022

One of a series of rulings relating to the tension between U.S. treaties with Japan and California’s alien land laws, the Tashiro decision gave a broad and liberal interpretation of the privileges guaranteed by treaties, emphasizing the common meanings of the words in a 1911 commerce treaty.

The U.S.-Japanese [a]Treaty of Commerce and Navigation of 1911Treaty of Commerce and Navigation of 1911 authorized citizens of Japan to participate in commerce, which included everything “incident to or necessary for trade upon the same terms as native citizens.” The treaty put significant limits on the extent to which California was able to enforce the discriminatory [a]Alien Land Law of 1913 (California)Alien Land Law, passed in 1913. In interpreting the treaty, the Supreme Court had ruled that the treaty protected the right to operate a pawnbroker business but that it did not extend to manufacturing or agricultural production.[c]Jordan v. TashiroJapanese immigrants;Jordan v. TashiroCalifornia;alien land laws[c]Jordan v. TashiroJapanese immigrants;Jordan v. TashiroCalifornia;alien land laws[cat]COURT CASES;Jordan v.Tashiro[03020][cat]EAST ASIAN IMMIGRANTS;Jordan v. Tashiro[03020][cat]INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS;Jordan v. Tashiro[03020]

K. Tashiro and other citizens of Japan residing in California petitioned the state government for the incorporation of a Japanese hospital in Los Angeles. State officials refused to consider the petition on the grounds that treaty rights did not extend to the operation of a business corporation. Tashiro and his associates challenged the refusal in state court. When the court agreed with Tashiro’s position, the secretary of state of California petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the ruling of the lower court. Writing the opinion of the Court, Justice Stone, Harlan F.Harlan F. Stone followed the precedent of liberally construing the privileges enumerated in treaties, and he concluded that the ordinary meanings of the words in the 1911 treaty necessarily included three relevant privileges: (1) conducting a business in corporate form, (2) providing medical services for a fee, and (3) leasing an appropriate amount of land needed for the purpose of a commercial business.[c]Jordan v. TashiroJapanese immigrants;Jordan v. TashiroCalifornia;alien land laws

Further Reading
  • Hyung-chan, Kim, ed. Asian Americans and the Supreme Court: A Documentary History. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.
  • LeMay, Michael, and Elliott Robert Barkan, eds. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues: A Documentary History. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1999.

Alien land laws

California

History of immigration after 1891

Japanese immigrants

Supreme Court, U.S.

Categories: History Content